Germany’s Constitutional Court ruled on Tuesday that lawmakers must set out legally binding criteria to protect people with disabilities and preexisting conditions in pandemic-related triage situations. Triage is the process of prioritizing patients for treatment either according to the seriousness of their illness or injury or their chances of survival. The court said legislators had violated the constitution by not setting out such rules before. Germany’s consitution, or Basic Law, states that “No person shall be disfavored because of disability.” The court has been deliberating on the issue since mid-2020. It has become urgent once more as Germany faces a massive fourth wave of COVID infections driven by the highly infectious omicron variant.
Table of Contents
Why was the ruling made?
The ruling came in response to a complaint by nine people with disabilities and previous illnesses who feared that they could be given up on by doctors under present guidelines if they became ill with COVID-19. They called for the state to lay down what selection criteria will be used to determine which patients continue to receive possibly lifesaving treatments if a choice has to be made when an intensive care unit faces too great a demand. Previous “clinical and ethical recommendations” for triage were issued by the German intensive care association DIVI along with other medical associations. The complainants felt that these recommendations could see them disadvantaged, as the general state of health and existing illnesses of patients were included as selection criteria.
What do patient advocates say?
The DIVI responded to the complaint by saying that no one would be refused treatment on the basis of their age, previous illnesses or disability and that the criteria would only come into play when such factors lowered the likelihood of surviving COVID-19. But it also called for the state to make a ruling to give medical personnel legal security. Advocates for the rights of patients have also voiced support for triage guidelines imposed by the state. “Federal parliamentarians are the only ones who are democratically authorized to take such a decision,” said the chair of the German Foundation for Patient Rights (DSP), Eugen Brysch. He told the dpa news agency that the issue centered largely on who would be taken off ventilators. “And that is something that the Bundestag should decide rather than economists,” he said, adding that rules should be the same in all hospitals. tj/rt (dpa, AFP)